Wise_Guy

Apni Marzi Se Kahan

Baat Niklay tu Dour Talk Jay Gi http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-kfYXUfdLs&feature=related

Pyaar ka pahla khat http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIAwgrbErTo&feature=related

Aur Aahista http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbbSxIqGXd0&feature=related

Jab Saamne Tum Aa Jaate Ho

Tumko dekha to ye khayal aaya

Jab Koi Baat Bigad Jaye

Tu Is Tarah Se Meri Zindagi Mein

hoton se chulo tum

Hoosh Waalon Ko Khabar Kya

Tumko Dekha to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0l1lEN8nII&feature=related

Kahien Door Jab Din Dhal Jae

Koi Yeh Kaise Bataayen

Chithi Na Koi Sandesh

Kagaz Ki Kashti http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EB7ih3X4C9M&a=2YU8bQVqfEs&playnext_from=ML

Tumko Dekha to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0l1lEN8nII&a=2YU8bQVqfEs&playnext_from=ML

Kiska chehra http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLprWQbivAk&a=2YU8bQVqfEs&playnext_from=ML

Tum Hamaare Nahin To Kaya Gham Hai http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDL5fYAaybU&feature=related

Koi faryad - Tum Bin

Tamanna Phir Machal Jaye http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hUyMIE2NUY

KABUL -- Twelve days before President Hamid Karzai denounced the behavior of Western countries in Afghanistan, he met a 4-year-old boy at the Tarin Kowt civilian hospital in the south. The boy had lost his legs in a February airstrike by U.S. Special Operations forces helicopters that killed more than 20 civilians. Karzai scooped him up from his mattress and walked out to the hospital courtyard, according to three witnesses. "Who injured you?" the president asked as helicopters passed overhead. The boy, crying alongside his relatives, pointed at the sky. The tears and rage Karzai encountered in that hospital in Uruzgan province lingered with him, according to several aides. It was one provocation amid a string of recent political disappointments that they said has helped fuel the president's emotional outpouring against the West and prompted a brief crisis in his relations with the United States. It was also a reminder that civilian casualties in Afghanistan have political reverberations far beyond the sites of the killings. Before dawn Monday, American soldiers strafed a passenger bus that approached their convoy outside Kandahar City, killing at least four Afghans, including a woman, and wounding 18 others in another incident that Afghan officials warn could hurt the U.S. military effort. The city, which spawned the Taliban movement, has become the focal point of American military efforts for the next few months. Of the 30,000 additional U.S. troops President Obama ordered to Afghanistan, 13,000 have arrived, and thousands more are headed to Kandahar in preparation for a summer offensive intended to roll back the insurgency. But Karzai told a gathering in Kandahar last week that he would not permit an American offensive there unless the people supported it. After Monday's shooting, residents blocked a road, denounced the American presence and demanded justice. "This is a savage action. They have committed a great crime," said Bismillah Afghanmal, a member of Kandahar's provincial council. "They knew that this was the public transportation way. . . . Buses always use that road." Tooryalai Wesa, the governor of Kandahar, condemned the shooting and called it "very irresponsible." Under Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, NATO forces have made reducing civilian casualties a top priority. McChrystal has restricted night raids, home searches and the close air support that troops often request during firefights, all in an effort to mitigate collateral damage to Afghan civilians. The U.S.-led NATO force issued a statement Monday saying it "deeply regrets the tragic loss of life" in Kandahar. But high-profile civilian killings continue to attract wide attention in Afghanistan. A Feb. 12 nighttime raid by U.S. Special Operations forces near Gardez, in the southeast, that killed five people, including two pregnant women, is being investigated after Afghan officials alleged that U.S. troops tampered with evidence at the scene. After the Feb. 22 Uruzgan airstrike -- on a bus mistakenly thought to be carrying insurgents -- killed more than 20 people, Canadian and American forces patrolling far from the scene in Kandahar City reported a sudden deterioration in residents' attitudes toward them. In some cases, residents threw rocks and spit at troops, according to U.S. military officials. "We have to calm people. You have to give them some satisfaction as to whether this will continue or not," Shaida M. Abdali, the deputy national security adviser, said in an interview last week. Abdali praised McChrystal's efforts to reduce civilian casualties and said the commander "has always been quick to apologize," but he said the Afghan government thinks more needs to change.

President Obama used an unprecedented summit on nuclear terrorism Monday to press global leaders to support further isolating Iran for its nuclear activities, and the White House said that China's leader had agreed to cooperate with tightening U.N. sanctions on the Islamic republic. The Nuclear Security Summit is the first large meeting of world leaders focused on how to keep nuclear materials away from terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda. The event drew 36 heads of state and delegations from 10 other countries to the city, which became a blur of flashing police lights and speeding black convoys. U.S. officials structured the summit to avoid controversial topics and achieve broad agreement on improving security at places where nuclear material is stored: military installations, civilian research reactors and other facilities. But, in bilateral meetings leading up to the event, Obama sought to send a message to Iran -- which denies it is developing a nuclear weapon -- that it must heed international efforts to restrain its nuclear program. White House officials said Obama told Chinese President Hu Jintao in a 90-minute meeting Monday that passing new U.N. sanctions against Iran is urgent. "The two presidents agreed that the two delegations should work on a sanctions resolution in New York, and that's what we're doing," said Jeffrey A. Bader, the National Security Council's senior director for Asian affairs. The Chinese, he said, "made clear that they are prepared to work with us." Bader called the meeting "another sign of international unity on this issue." China has backed three previous sanctions resolutions on Iran, and its support is crucial because it is one of five veto-wielding members of the Security Council. Ma Zhaoxu, a spokesman for the Chinese delegation, was more cautious about Monday's meeting, indicating that the two sides still differ on the elements of a sanctions resolution. Ma repeated the standard Chinese diplomatic formulation, saying that Hu told Obama he hoped that countries would "actively seek effective ways to resolve the Iranian nuclear issue through dialogue and negotiations." Iran was not invited to the summit. Nor was North Korea, which quit the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 2003 and has twice tested a weapon. But with a flurry of meetings on the sidelines of the summit, "those countries not here are not out of the agenda. People will discuss how to manage them," Finnish President Tarja Halonen said in an interview. The summit comes at a key moment on the diplomatic calendar. In addition to the looming sanctions effort at the United Nations, nearly 200 countries are scheduled next month to consider strengthening the Non-Proliferation Treaty, the pact that long checked the spread of weapons but is now in danger of collapse. Fortifying the treaty is at the heart of Obama's nuclear agenda. Joshua Pollack, a nuclear expert, said Obama's meetings Sunday and Monday with some of the less prominent world leaders, such as those from Kazakhstan, Malaysia and Ukraine, reflected preparations for next month's treaty conference in New York. At that meeting, "every member state has an equal vote, even the ones that don't often dominate the headlines . . . so there's a courtship aspect," he wrote on the blog ArmsControlWonk.

TEHRAN: Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has written to UN chief Ban Ki-moon, asking him to launch an investigation into the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, news reports said on Monday. “The minimum expectation from your excellency is to set up an independent and trusted fact-finding group to comprehensively investigate the real factors behind September 11,” Ahmadinejad said in the text of the letter carried by official news agencies. They did not say when the letter was sent. The president, who in March dismissed 9/11 as a “big lie,” said in the letter that the attacks “were the main pretext for attacks” by NATO on Afghanistan and Iraq. Several times Ahmadinejad has questioned the accepted version of the Al-Qaeda strikes on New York and Washington which killed nearly 3,000 people. In January, he branded September 11 “a suspicious affair” similar to the Holocaust, which he dismissed as a “myth” in 2005, drawing widespread condemnation

WASHINGTON/BEIRUT: President Barack Obama and Jordan’s King Abdullah II called on Monday for proximity peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians to take place “as soon as possible” despite the current deadlock. The White House said in a statement that the two leaders discussed the impasse in US efforts to launch indirect peace talks when they met on the sidelines of a 47-nation nuclear security summit here. “Both agreed that Israeli-Palestinian proximity talks should begin as soon as possible, and transition quickly to direct negotiations,” the statement said. “They also agreed that both sides should refrain from actions that undermine trust during these talks.” The statement, which also said the two leaders discussed Iraq, the Iranian nuclear confrontation and Afghanistan, did not however spell out how Obama and the king thought the current deadlock could be resolved. Israel and the White House have been locked in a rare public confrontation over getting proximity talks started. Netanyahu decided not to attend the nuclear summit, after returning home last month to media derision after a testy White House meeting with Obama failed to make obvious progress. Netanyahu reportedly feared that that Muslim nations here would make an issue of Israel’s assumed nuclear status, but his decision revived debate about his tense relations with the Obama administration. Israel has deflected blame over the stalled peace effort, after the Palestinians refused to join indirect talks without a Jewish settlement freeze and following a flare-up of violence in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip. But Washington is angry at several new settlement projects in East Al-Quds, seen by Palestinians as the capital of their future state. Monday’s meeting between Obama and the King came a week after unnamed US officials floated the idea of launching a new unilateral US peace plan in an effort to unblock the impasse in the Middle East, in several newspaper accounts. But, on the record, officials are saying no decision has yet been made on a strategic shift of the US position, as a row rumbles on with Israel over settlements in Al-Quds. Meanwhile, a Lebanese military prosecutor on Monday called for three men to be sentenced to death on charges of spying for Israel and the attempted murder by one of them of an Al-Qaeda suspect. Judge Samih al-Hajj charged the defendants—two Lebanese and one Palestinian—with “providing Israel with information as well as facilitating its aggressions and terrorist acts on Lebanon,” according to the charge sheet. Palestinian Mohammed Ibrahim Awad and Lebanese Robert Edmond Kfoury are both in custody. The third suspect, Lebanese Elias Riyad Karam, was charged in absentia. Awad is also charged with the attempted murder of his relative Naim Abbas, who is suspected of involvement in an Al-Qaeda cell in the Ain al-Helweh refugee camp in southern Lebanon. Ain al-Helweh is the largest of Lebanon’s 12 Palestinian camps and authorities say it has provided sanctuary for extremists and fugitives from the law. By longstanding convention, the Lebanese army does not enter the camps, leaving security inside in the hands of Palestinians.

WASHINGTON: Pakistan Monday urged non-discriminatory access to civil nuclear technology to meet the country's exponentially growing energy needs as it reaffirmed its firm commitment to nuclear security at a major summit of world leaders. Spelling out its nuclear policy in a national statement at the Nuclear Security Summit, Pakistan welcomed US President Obama's call for security of nuclear material and hoped the summit would be a catalyst for fostering a nuclear security culture around the world. “Pakistan has more than 35 years of experience in running nuclear power plants. With trained professional manpower and a strong nuclear safety and security culture, Pakistan fully qualifies for participation in civil nuclear cooperation at the international level,” Islamabad said in a statement. Prime Minister Syed Yousaf Raza Gilani is heading the Pakistani delegation at the two-day summit. “We urge all relevant forums to give Pakistan access to nuclear technology for peaceful uses, in a non-discriminatory manner, to meet its growing demand for energy,” the country informed the summit, being attended by top leaders of some 47 countries. The statement expressed Pakistan's support for the renewed international interest in nuclear power generation to meet the challenge of climate change. “As a country with advanced fuel cycle capability, Pakistan is in a position to provide nuclear fuel cycle services under IAEA safeguards, and to participate in any non-discriminatory nuclear fuel cycle assurance mechanism.” On nuclear security, Islamabad said it “would continue to refine and modernize its technical and human resources and mechanisms on safety and security of nuclear weapons, nuclear materials, facilities, and assets.” “Pakistan would cooperate with the global community in accordance with its national policies and requirements as well as international obligations.” Islamabad informed the world leaders that its nuclear programme is security-driven with a policy of minimum credible deterrent but said it is against an open-ended arms race in South Asia. It highlights the vital need for Pakistan and India to engage in a substantive sustained dialogue on all issues including nuclear CBMs.